Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

I’m normally not much into cold war era stuff; between the bleakness of the whole Soviet situation and the incredibly bad fashion choices, I’m just not interested.  I am not someone who thinks the idea of espionage is cool or glamorous.  Okay, I enjoyed the first Bourne movie, but that’s about it. I loathe James Bond. I find any of the spy movies that treats it as fun or fabulous or anything other than dreadful to be totally moronic.  And I only liked the first Bourne movie, since the girl snuffs it about 10 minutes into the second.

This movie though, is not a regular spy movie. It does not treat espionage as glamorous, it does not trade in heart-throbs drinking martinis.  It is a lot closer to what I imagine MI-6 or even the CIA would have been like in the sixties and seventies. Which is not to say that I really enjoyed spending time in the world of the film.  But it does allow me to take the movie seriously, which I usually can’t do with anything relating to spies.

This was a movie I had to see from the first moment I heard about it, despite my reluctance to see spy films.  There would never be a movie with this cast that I wouldn’t go see.  It stars Gary Oldman, Colin Firth, John Hurt (aka Mr. Ollivander), Benedict Cumberbatch, and also has Tom Hardy and Toby Jones (most recently he appeared in Julian Fellowes’ Titanic miniseries. He was the little bloke with the mean Irish wife.)

So you know the acting is going to be good. The film is about a semi-retired intelligence officer (Oldman) who has to conduct a secret investigation to find the mole within MI-6.  It’s a classic, trust-no-one, sort of movie where you spend half your time wondering if you are being tricked and Oldman is the mole.

The film is very interesting in its pace and its slow unraveling of realization and of facts.  It takes a long time to figure out what’s going on, and it can take some patience to remain focused throughout.  In that way, it sort of mirrors a real investigation–there are moments of insight and action, and moments of tedium and lack of progress.  Also, the filmmakers have chosen to portray a ’60s-’70s Britain that is just as dull visually as you can expect it to have been in real life.  This is not the bright colors and ludicrous outfits of Mad Men.  This is bleak old furniture from the ’50s, the sort of government-sponsored buildings that all look like elementary schools or hospitals, and the tedious environment of gray file cabinets and early electronics yellowed with cigarette smoke.  The very un-visually appealing nature of the movie is sort of visually appealing in its own way.  It adds verisimilitude, I guess. Or maybe I’m projecting my own values onto it.  I think that espionage, that living a life of lies and ambiguity would be necessarily bleak and awful, so I see the bleakness of the film as reflecting that truth.

At any rate, it’s a quiet, subtle film and in that way the exact opposite of Bond’s bright colors, invisible cars, jumping out of planes, etc.  There are no combat scenes.  The violence is realistic and horrifying.  We mostly see the aftermath.

The overwhelming impression (I got) of the film is one where this is not a life you would particularly want.  There are a few characters who come out of the action unscathed, but the majority of them are seriously fucked over by their time doing intelligence work. And, not to provide any concrete spoilers, a few died by the end.

It wasn’t a film I particularly enjoyed being inside of, as I said.  But I think the subject it covered was covered really well, accurately, believably. It didn’t glorify or glamorize any of the dirty business of espionage, but it also gave me a sort of thrill to be able to figure things out along the way.  Because of the way it’s structured, you can discover little clues and figure things out from bits of information dropped in your lap casually 40 minutes earlier.  Like a scavenger hunt. There was some sort of accompanying pleasure to do with picking up the pieces. But, overall, it wasn’t a pleasant film to watch.

The acting was brilliant, though quite understated and no one was given enough time or lines to really and truly shine. The only characters with a lot of screen time were Benedict Cumberbatch’s and Gary Oldman’s.  Gary was playing a truly seasoned spy, and as such I think he downplayed his emotions quite a bit.  His character doesn’t reveal much of anything, doesn’t react to much of anything.  The sense I got from him was just of one big brain processing all possible information coming his way. Always thinking. Benedict’s character is younger (obviously) and less experienced, so I think it’s right that his character is a bit more ruffled by everything that’s going on.  He does a really great job, though I must say he is a terribly ugly crier!  Everyone else was only on film for moments here and there, so it was hard to really see them.  I wonder if maybe they were in the movie longer than I think they were, and this just isn’t the sort of movie that lends itself to much emotion.  Not to be stereotypical, but there are basically no women in it. Either way, there wasn’t much there.  The only exception was Mark Strong, which wasn’t a name I recognized.  He did a brilliant job with his part, though there was a part with a bird that I really disliked.

All in all, I think it’s worth watching, but don’t expect an action movie, don’t watch it if you’re tired, or if you like to think of the spy life as something out of Alias.  It’s the sort of movie you have to be in the mood for.

Advertisements

12 responses to “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

  1. I was like WHAT! No love for Mark Strong?! I adore this man, he is wonderful and I’m so glad that he is getting cast in more and more films. Didn’t you see him in Stardust? Sherlock Holmes? No? *crickets* Oh well, his bits with Colin Firth at the end slayed me. Also, I really rate Ciaran Hinds and would place him much higher than that little hobgoblin Toby Jones, though he was criminally underused in this film.
    [Sidenote: is there ever a time when Benedict isn’t ugly? Let’s just call it how it is. Fabulous Holmes, very talented actor and I look foward to seeing much more of him, but he ain’t cute. At all. He looks like Sid from Ice Age. Except Ginger.]

    • Just watched Captain America last night. Toby Jones was in that too! He’s in everything I watch lately! And, thanks to you, I can’t help but think ‘hobgoblin’ every time I see him!

  2. I just looked up Ciaran Hinds, because he is one of those guys whose face is familiar but I don’t know why. But…now I’m more confused. IMDB says he played Aberforth in DH? What? He was completely unrecognizable and I’m starting to think IMDB is messing with me. Aaanyway, Mark Strong was really good in this, and I’ll have to keep a look out for him now. I’ve seen Sherlock Holmes, but not since it was in theaters. Never saw Stardust. Also, yes, Benedict looks like a Ginger Sid, but…I can’t help it. I find his unattractiveness attractive. Same reason I have a crush on Conan O’Brien. Defies logic. Or…maybe it’s because they’re both gingers? Hmm…

    • HAHAHA Conan!
      Also: I forgot Ciaran was Aberforth… How soon can they remake those movies as Rated R with a brand new cast to rectify all the egregious errors in casting? Kenneth Branagh is no Lockhart and everyone was at least a decade older than they should have been. *grumble grumble*
      In any case you must see Stardust immediately. And read the book by Neil Gaiman. Yis!

  3. Benedict as Holmes has gone a long way towards me liking him, but the first thing I ever saw him in was Atonement and I have years of hatred built up toward him. Rapist. Urgh.

    • I haven’t seen Atonement in years. I remember it did my head in quite a lot. I don’t really want to go back and watch it now that I adore Benedict so much…it would ruin everything. Although, I remember most/all of my hatred was actually directed at that blonde kid..Briony. She was the worst person in the world.

  4. Hahaha glad to have helped get you through what I assume was a poor movie viewing experience. Maybe I’m being unduly harsh…I did see that movie at the Drive In so it’s much harder for me to get into the movie and concentrate (zero sexual innuendo implied there). I did have a phase too where I was seeing him EVERYWHERRRRE. Tin Tin, Hunger Games, HP7, Dr. Who….ACK! To think back on all the happy years when I was unaware of his presence.

    • No, it wasn’t a very good movie. And I just watched Tin Tin last week too! He is everywhere.

      • I enjoyed Tin Tin…the visuals were so realistic! It kind of distracted me….why bother doing motion capture and the whole rigamarole if you are going to make it nearly indistinguishable from real film (apart from the noses!)?

  5. Hello! I’ve been following your weblog for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Houston Texas! Just wanted to mention keep up the great job!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s